View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Innovation Design Sprint |  Business Strategy Three Horizons |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | Three Horizons helps clarify strategic options across different timeframes. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and investment choices, and captures the result as a horizon map, portfolio view, and initiatives per horizon. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 4-5 Tage | Halbtags-Workshop, dann iterativ |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 5-8 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | Horizon map, Portfolio view, Initiatives per horizon, Resource plan |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | StrategyInnovationPortfolioForesight |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
