View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Jobs to Be Done |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Product Discovery Kano Model |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen | 60-120 min | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 5-12 | 10-50 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity List | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes |
Tagsno overlap | CustomerOutcomesNeeds | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
