View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Strategy Impact Mapping |  Systems Thinking System Dynamics Simulation |  Systems Thinking Wardley Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. | System Dynamics Simulation makes assumptions about time, delay, and feedback testable through experiments. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a simulation model and scenario reports. | Wardley Mapping makes visible where an offering stands today and where it can evolve. The method connects user need, value chain, and evolution stages into a strategic basis for platform, build, or buy decisions. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | Mehrere Tage bis Wochen | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 1-5 Modellierende, Stakeholder asynchron | 2-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options | Simulation Model, Scenario Reports | Wardley Map, Strategic Options, Evolution Notes |
Tagsno overlap | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning | Systems thinkingDynamicsSimulationAnalysis | StrategySystems thinkingDynamics |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
