View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Ideal Days |  Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes |  Agile Working Agreements |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats. | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 15-60 min | Half day | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-9 | Team-Leads plus Architecture | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity Caveats | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationEffortAgile | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization | TeamCollaborationAgile |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
