View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Ideal Days | ![]() Agile ROAM Board | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 15-60 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-9 | 3-15 | 1-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity Caveats | ROAM Board, Owner List | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationEffortAgile | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






