methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Ideal Days.
Agile
Ideal Days
Anonymous individual judgments pass through feedback loops to form a distribution.
Decision Making
Delphi Method
Paper illustration for NoEstimates.
Agile
NoEstimates
Purposedifferent
When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats.When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together.When estimating slows a team down more than it helps, it shifts the focus to flow, small slices, and real lead time. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Throughput Data, Flow Forecast, and Slicing Rules.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighMedium
Timedifferent
15-60 min1-4 Wochenlaufend
Participantsdifferent
2-96-30 Experten2-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity CaveatsExpert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption NotesThroughput Data, Flow Forecast, Slicing Rules
Tagsno overlap
EstimationEffortAgile
ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy
EstimationForecastingFlow
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration for Wideband Delphi.
Decision Making
Wideband Delphi
Paper illustration of DIBB with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
DIBB
Paper illustration for Dot Estimation.
Facilitation
Dot Estimation
Paper illustration of the Force Field Analysis working structure.
Decision Making
Force Field Analysis