View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Strategy ICE Scoring | ![]() Agile Planning Poker | ![]() Agile Affinity Estimation |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 2-5 min je Item | 30-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-9 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | ICE Table, Top Idea List | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






