View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Innovation How Might We | ![]() Architecture C4 Model | ![]() Decision Making RAPID |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With a stuck problem carrying many implicit assumptions, the method translates observations into open, workable questions. It sharpens the problem frame without pre-thinking the solution, turning frustration or fuzziness into a search space with clear direction. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | In complex management decisions, clarity is often missing about who recommends, who agrees, and who makes the decision. RAPID creates this assignment and stabilizes decisions across several levels. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30–45 min | 1-4 h | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-10 | 1-5 | 3-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | HMW Questions, Challenge Framing, Idea Prompts | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | RAPID Role Map, Recommendation, Decision Log |
Tagsno overlap | FramingOpportunityIdeationQuestions | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | DecisionRolesGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






