methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Hooked Model with its method-specific working model.
Growth
Hooked Model
Paper board with the four ROAM fields Resolved, Owned, Accepted, and Mitigated.
Agile
ROAM Board
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Purposedifferent
The Hooked Model helps clarify engagement loops, user behavior, and experiments. It makes repeat behavior measurable and captures the result as a hooked loop, trigger map, and reward design.When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List.In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
Multiple workshops over several weeks20-40 min initial, dann laufend90-180 min
Participantsdifferent
2-83-154-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Hooked loop, Trigger map, Reward design, Ethics checkROAM Board, Owner ListDecision Rights Matrix, Agreement
Tagsno overlap
GrowthBehaviorRetention
RiskAgileTrackingAlignment
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

A paper-based illustration representing North Star Metric with its core stages and visible working result.
Growth
North Star Metric
Paper illustration of an assumption matrix with prioritized test cards
Decision Making
Assumption Surfacing