methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of GIST Planning with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
GIST Planning
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Paper illustration for Contradiction Analysis.
Innovation
Contradiction Analysis
Purposedifferent
GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list.For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.When a system should improve while another measure suffers as a result, the method makes the underlying conflict precisely formulable. It separates the desired effect from its side effect. This makes solutions possible that address the contradiction deliberately instead of half-heartedly.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
Wochen bis Monate je Goal45-90 min60-120 min
Participantsdifferent
3-102-52-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Goals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reportsA3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisContradiction Statement, Abstraction Notes, Solution Principles, Concept Ideas
Tagsno overlap
RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
ContradictionsInnovationProblem solving
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.