View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Failure Mode and Effects AnalysisSAAM (Software Architecture Analysis Method)Business Model Stress Test
| Criterion |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |  Architecture SAAM (Software Architecture Analysis Method) |  Business Strategy Business Model Stress Test |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | SAAM helps teams judge an architecture’s suitability for selected tasks and changes. It is particularly useful for examining modifiability and comparing architecture alternatives with clear reasoning. | A Business Model Stress Test checks how well a business model holds up under pressure and headwinds. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and courses of action. The result is captured as a stress-test report and action plan per scenario. |
Complexitysame | High | High | High |
Timedifferent | 2-6 h | Preparation, scenario analysis, and findings review; effort depends on scope | Half day |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | Architecture experts and stakeholders for scenarios and weighting | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | Domain functions mapped to components and connections, Quality attributes and evaluation criteria, Typical tasks and their effects on the architecture, Reasoned evaluation or comparison of alternatives | Stress Test Report, Action Plan per Scenario |
Tagsno overlap | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | ArchitectureChangeAnalysisComparisonQuality | StrategyBusiness modelRiskDiagnosis |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
