View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion | ![]() Innovation Crazy 8s | ![]() UX Design Design Studio |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | With only a few minutes available and a still-fuzzy solution search, the method forces a wide range of variants. It produces fast sketches before the first idea can settle in, making different directions directly comparable and open to further development. | When several designs need to be quickly put in relation to each other, it makes ideas visible and comparable. It encourages early variants instead of long upfront debates. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 8-15 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 8-80 | 1-10 | 3-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Sketch Set, Idea Shortlist, Direction Options | Sketches, Concept Directions, Design Decisions |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | BrainstormingSketchingSpeedDivergenceDesign sprint | SketchingCollaborationIdeation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






