methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Paper illustration of a calm four-quadrant Assumption Map with hypothesis cards and emphasis on important assumptions with little evidence.
Product Discovery
Assumption Mapping
Empathy Mapping
UX Research
Empathy Mapping
Purposedifferent
When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first.When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage45-60 min30–60 min
Participantsdifferent
10-302-84-8
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Click Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsAssumption map, Test backlog, Risk rankingEmpathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps
Tagsno overlap
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation
SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration for Risk Storming.
Architecture
Risk Storming
Paper illustration of Riskiest Assumption Test with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
Riskiest Assumption Test
Affinity Diagramming
UX Research
Affinity Diagramming