View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations Fault Tree Analysis | ![]() Facilitation Lean Coffee | ![]() Facilitation Open Space Technology |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage. | When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait. | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 2-6 h | 30-90 min | 0.5-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 3-20 | 20-500+ |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions | Prioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action Items | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics |
Tagsno overlap | RiskRoot causeSafety | FacilitationAutonomyDialogue | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






