View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Fault Tree Analysis |  Operations Barrier Analysis |  Innovation Reverse Brainstorming |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage. | For a risk that can only be managed through multiple layers of protection, the method examines the effectiveness of each barrier. It shows where safeguards are missing, too weak, or fail under real conditions. | For persistent errors or blockages, the method shifts the view to the opposite of the desired effect. It exposes the mechanics of failure and makes hidden causes easier to grasp. This makes improvement more concrete and the problem clearer. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 2-6 h | 2-4 h | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 2-6 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions | Barrier Inventory, Failure Analysis per Barrier, Action Backlog | Reverse Ideas, Risk Themes, Solution Ideas |
Tagsno overlap | RiskRoot causeSafety | Root causeSafetyIncident | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityRisk |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
