View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Decision Making Decision Matrix |  Decision Making Risk Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | When several options collide with several criteria, comparison quickly becomes subjective. A Decision Matrix makes the trade-off visible and brings weighting, criteria, and options into a shared logic. | When a project faces many possible disruptions, it quickly becomes unclear which risks deserve attention first. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Risk Matrix and a Top Risk List. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 2-8 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Decision Matrix, Scoring Rationale, Selected Option | Risk Matrix, Top Risk List |
Tagsno overlap | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | DecisionCriteriaScoringTradeoffs | RiskDecisionPrioritizationAssessment |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
