View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Example Mapping |  Agile Working Agreements |  Innovation Design Charrette |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. | In a tightly timed design process with many participants, the method pools several lines of thinking in a short time. It brings parallel design energy without letting the discussion tip into endless coordination. This quickly produces solid directions for architecture or space. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 45-90 min | Halber Tag bis mehrere Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-7 | 3-12 | 10-50 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence | Sketches and Concepts, Consolidated Solution Sketch, Prioritized Direction |
Tagsno overlap | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | TeamCollaborationAgile | BrainstormingWorkshopCollaborationIdeation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
