View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Evaporating Cloud |  Systems Thinking Futures Wheel |  Business Strategy Three Horizons |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The method makes visible why two seemingly incompatible demands arise and which assumption must be tested to resolve the conflict. | The Futures Wheel helps explore the consequences of a decision, a trend, or a strategic move in a structured way. It makes visible which first, second, and third-order effects could arise from an event. | Three Horizons helps clarify strategic options across different timeframes. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and investment choices, and captures the result as a horizon map, portfolio view, and initiatives per horizon. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 60-120 min | Halbtags-Workshop, dann iterativ |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-10 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Conflict Cloud, Assumption List, Breakthrough Ideas, Next Experiments | Futures Wheel, Consequence Chains, Strategic Signals | Horizon map, Portfolio view, Initiatives per horizon, Resource plan |
Tagsno overlap | Theory of ConstraintsAssumptionsSystems thinking | ForesightSystems thinkingSignals | StrategyInnovationPortfolioForesight |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
