View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research Empathy Mapping | ![]() Business Strategy 5-Minuten VC-Check | ![]() Product Discovery Concierge MVP |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. | The 5-Minute VC Check clarifies opportunities and strategic options at the earliest idea stage. It compares problem quality, customer willingness to pay, alternatives, differentiation, and market potential, and captures the result as a VC-check note, go/sharpen/park decision, and risk list. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min | 5-15 min | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 4-8 | 1-5 | 3-10 Kunden |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps | VC-check note, Go/sharpen/park decision, Risk and assumption list, Next validation step | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks |
Tagsno overlap | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop | StartupValidationCompetition | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






