View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research Empathy Mapping | ![]() UX Research Affinity Diagramming | ![]() Product Discovery Learning Card |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. | When research notes, feedback, or observations sit unconnected side by side, affinity diagramming sorts the raw material into solid themes. Many individual points turn into patterns that make decisions and opportunities clearer. | The Learning Card connects traceable test results to a reasoned next action while keeping the limits of the insight visible. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min | 45–90 min | 25-40 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-8 | 3-10 | 1-5 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps | Theme clusters, Insight statements, Opportunity areas | Learning Card with evidence and next action |
Tagsno overlap | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop | SynthesisQualitativeRoot cause | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryLearning |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






