View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation Double Diamond |  Growth A/B Testing |  Product Strategy ICE Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For complex problems with a fuzzy situation, the method cleanly separates search space and decision. It first creates breadth in understanding and then focus in elaboration. This brings open questions, problem definition, and solution path into a traceable movement. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. | When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | Wochen bis Monate | 1-4 Wochen | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 1-6 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Problem Statement, Solution Options, Prototypes, Deliverables per Phase | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary | ICE Table, Top Idea List |
Tagsno overlap | ProcessDivergenceInnovation | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation | PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
