methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration of Product Kata with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Product Kata
Paper illustration for Troika Consulting.
Facilitation
Troika Consulting
Purposedifferent
When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.Product Kata helps clarify customer problems, solution ideas, and evidence through a repeatable improvement routine. It captures direction, current metric, target metric, experiment notes, and learning.When someone needs to sort out a concrete work problem, Troika Consulting offers fast peer consulting with a tight focus. The method brings perspectives together without taking responsibility out of the person's hands.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLow
Timedifferent
5-15 min1-2 Wochen je Loop30-45 min
Participantsdifferent
3-203-103-30
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Ranked list, Consensus signal, ShortlistDirection, Current metric, Target metric, Experiment note, Learning reportAdvice Notes, Next Actions, Peer Insights
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
OutcomesDiscoveryLearningIterationCoaching
FacilitationCoachingLearning
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Paper illustration of Opportunity Scoring with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Opportunity Scoring
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop