View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Dot Voting | ![]() Decision Making Delphi Method | ![]() Facilitation 1-2-4-All |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 5-15 min | 1-4 Wochen | 10-20 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 6-30 Experten | 4-100+ |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy | FacilitationInclusionIdeation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






