methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Dot Estimation.
Facilitation
Dot Estimation
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper illustration for PERT Estimation.
Decision Making
PERT Estimation
Purposedifferent
When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.On complex initiatives, a plain average tends to understate just how uncertain the outcome really is. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a PERT Estimate, Expected Value, and Risk Notes.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMedium
Timedifferent
5-20 min20-45 min15-45 min
Participantsdifferent
3-201-81-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion TargetsOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesPERT Estimate, Expected Value, Risk Notes
Tagsno overlap
EstimationEffortRisk
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
EstimationUncertaintyRisk
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration for Three-Point Estimation.
Decision Making
Three-Point Estimation