View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research Diary Study | ![]() Agile Three Amigos | ![]() UX Research Contextual Inquiry |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory. | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | 15-30 min | 1-3 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 5-20 | 3 | 4-12 Beobachtungen |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Diary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience Timeline | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points |
Tagsno overlap | UX researchTrackingBehavior | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement | UX researchObservationContext |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






