View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Diary Study |  Product Strategy ICE Scoring |  UX Research Contextual Inquiry |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory. | When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list. | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | 30-60 min | 1-3 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 5-20 | 2-8 | 4-12 Beobachtungen |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Diary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience Timeline | ICE Table, Top Idea List | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points |
Tagsno overlap | UX researchTrackingBehavior | PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision | UX researchObservationContext |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
