View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Design Design Studio | ![]() Facilitation 1-2-4-All | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several designs need to be quickly put in relation to each other, it makes ideas visible and comparable. It encourages early variants instead of long upfront debates. | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 10-20 min | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 4-100+ | 1-3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Sketches, Concept Directions, Design Decisions | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | SketchingCollaborationIdeation | FacilitationInclusionIdeation | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






