View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation Design Sprint |  Architecture Software Architecture Canvas |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 4-5 Tage | 1-2 h | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-8 | 3-10 | 1-3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | Architecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality Attributes | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
