View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |  UX Research User Interviews |  UX Research Personas |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. | When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible. | When target groups stay too vague and teams talk about the same people differently, personas create a shared, solid picture of usage. Condensed profiles make needs, contexts, and differences tangible enough for decisions. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 30–60 min per interview | 1-3 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 1 participant per interview | Internes Team |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements | Interview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary | Persona Profiles, Needs Summary, Scenario Notes |
Tagsno overlap | AutonomyRolesTeam | QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery | ResearchCustomerSynthesis |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
