View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |  Innovation Design Thinking |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | For complex user problems with an uncertain cause, the method connects observation, interpretation, and experiment into a learning cycle. It keeps the focus on real needs and avoids premature solution language. This produces robust decisions for product and service. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 1 Tag bis mehrere Wochen | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 4-10 | 1-3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | Problem Statement, Prototype, Test Learnings | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | InnovationPrototypeResearch | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
