View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Agile Example Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 15-45 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 1-3 | 3-7 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






