View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making Decision Matrix | ![]() Facilitation Dot Voting | ![]() Product Strategy RICE Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several options collide with several criteria, comparison quickly becomes subjective. A Decision Matrix makes the trade-off visible and brings weighting, criteria, and options into a shared logic. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When many initiatives compete for the same resources, it brings reach, impact, confidence, and effort into one shared ranking. It makes prioritization economically connectable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 5-15 min | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-20 | 2-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Decision Matrix, Scoring Rationale, Selected Option | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | RICE Scores, Ranked List, Assumption Log |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionCriteriaScoringTradeoffs | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | PrioritizationScoringRoadmapTradeoffs |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






