View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Design Customer Journey Canvas | ![]() Facilitation Six Thinking Hats | ![]() UX Design Service Blueprinting |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a journey needs to be understood across several phases, it arranges experience, touchpoints, and opportunities into one picture. It makes gaps and friction along the user path clear. | When a topic gets stuck too quickly in the same thinking mode, Six Thinking Hats deliberately separates the perspectives. This means facts, risks, creativity, and emotional signals get worked through one after another instead of mixed together. | When a service experience is spread across several touchpoints, it brings frontstage and backstage together. It shows where user contact and internal responsibility must fit. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 45-90 min | 0.5-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 4-12 | 6-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Customer Journey Canvas, Pain Points, Experience Opportunities | Perspective Notes, Decision Inputs, Action Items | Service Blueprint, Fail Points, Ownership Map |
Tagsno overlap | JourneyCustomerService designCanvas | FacilitationOptionsDecision | Service designOperationsJourneyBlueprint |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






