View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Delivery Cost of Delay |  Product Strategy ICE Scoring |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. | When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 30-60 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 2-8 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence | ICE Table, Top Idea List | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision | PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
