View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Delivery Cost of Delay | ![]() Agile Affinity Estimation | ![]() Facilitation Dot Estimation |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 30-90 min | 5-20 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 3-12 | 3-20 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | EstimationEffortRisk |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






