View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Contextual Inquiry |  Engineering Kanban |  Operations Gemba Walk |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | When work sits in too many parallel streams, throughput suffers and no one sees the bottlenecks. Kanban makes the flow of work visible and limits overload so a system becomes calmer and more predictable. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen | Ongoing | 30-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 2-12 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | Kanban board, WIP policies, Flow metrics | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas |
Tagsno overlap | UX researchObservationContext | FlowVisual managementDelivery | LeanObservationProcessOperations |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
