View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Context Canvas | ![]() UX Research Usability Testing | ![]() UX Research Tree Testing |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When an environment of users, systems, and constraints is hard to grasp, it puts the context compactly on the table. It creates a clear reading of influence, boundary, and dependency. | When a product is built but people get stuck on tasks, usability testing shows the friction at concrete points. Observed use instead of self-report makes visible where orientation, understanding, or interaction breaks down. | When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-2 h je Session | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | Based on research question | Based on research question |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Context canvas, Open questions, Shared context notes | Usability Issues, Severity List, Recommendations | Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA |
Tagsno overlap | ContextFramingRequirementsCanvas | ValidationUXPrototype | Information architectureNavigationFindability |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






