View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |  Growth A/B Testing |  Operations 5 Whys |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. | For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 1-4 Wochen | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-30 | 1-6 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary | Root cause notes, Countermeasures |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation | Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
