View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Competency QuestionsLASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews)Quality Attribute Workshop
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling Competency Questions |  Architecture LASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews) |  Architecture Quality Attribute Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Competency Questions translate a domain model into concrete questions that it must be able to answer. The method keeps the model's scope clean and prevents pretty but useless structures. | LASR helps development teams identify where their software falls short of important quality goals and which improvements to consider. A small group with existing system knowledge can make an initial assessment and investigate open questions in more detail. | A Quality Attribute Workshop translates quality requirements into concrete scenarios and architecture impulses. The method brings product, engineering, and operations to the same view of desired properties. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h | 3–4 h for initial assessment; preparation and deeper analysis additional | 2-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 1 or a small team; particularly suitable for 3–4 people | 5-15 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Competency Question Set, Required Concepts, Test Queries, Coverage Matrix | Lean Mission Statement describing the software’s purpose, Prioritized quality goals and evaluation criteria, Risks and estimated gaps against quality goals, More closely examined findings and open checks | Quality Scenarios, Priority List, Architecture Concerns |
Tagsno overlap | OntologyKnowledge graphScopeRequirementsSemantic | ArchitectureQualityRiskAssessmentLean | RequirementsArchitectureWorkshop |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
