View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Architecture C4 Model | ![]() Product Strategy RICE Scoring | ![]() Product Strategy ICE Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | When many initiatives compete for the same resources, it brings reach, impact, confidence, and effort into one shared ranking. It makes prioritization economically connectable. | When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 h | 60-90 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-5 | 2-10 | 2-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | RICE Scores, Ranked List, Assumption Log | ICE Table, Top Idea List |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | PrioritizationScoringRoadmapTradeoffs | PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






