View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Business Strategy Balanced Scorecard | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Balanced Scorecard translates strategy into a few interconnected perspectives and metrics. It holds impact, steering, and learning together in daily work instead of narrowing strategy down to financial figures. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | Halber Tag bis mehrere Wochen | 15-45 min | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 1-3 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Balanced Scorecard, Strategic Measures, Initiative Map | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyMetricsExecution | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






