View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |  Architecture Risk Storming |  Operations Eat the Frog |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog. | The method protects energy and attention for the task that creates the largest progress and is often postponed. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-60 min | 60-90 min | 15-90 min daily |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 4-12 | 1 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | Annotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog | Priority Task, Completion Note, Daily Focus |
Tagsno overlap | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation | PrioritizationProductivityFocusExecution |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
