View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Assumption Mapping | ![]() Product Strategy OKRs | ![]() Product Strategy SMART Goals |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | When strategic direction needs to become measurable, it connects ambition with checkable results. It makes goals connectable to focus and review. | When goals are formulated too generally, it brings measurability, direction, and timing into shape. It prevents intentions from staying without clear verification. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-60 min | 1-2 h Setup | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 2-20 | 1-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | OKR set, Measurement plan, Review cadence | SMART Goal, Measurement Note, Deadline |
Tagsno overlap | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | GoalsAlignmentOutcomesMeasurement | GoalsPlanningMeasurementAlignment |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






