View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Affinity Estimation | ![]() Agile T-Shirt Sizing | ![]() Facilitation Dot Estimation |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | When effort only needs to be classified roughly, it makes comparability more important than false precision. It helps sort work quickly into manageable sizes. | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 15-45 min | 5-20 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 2-12 | 3-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | Size Buckets, Rough Backlog Map, Split Candidates | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets |
Tags1 shared | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | EstimationAgileRoadmap | EstimationEffortRisk |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






