View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Affinity Estimation |  Growth Hooked Model |  Agile Planning Poker |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | The Hooked Model helps clarify engagement loops, user behavior, and experiments. It makes repeat behavior measurable and captures the result as a hooked loop, trigger map, and reward design. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | Multiple workshops over several weeks | 2-5 min je Item |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 2-8 | 3-9 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | Hooked loop, Trigger map, Reward design, Ethics check | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | GrowthBehaviorRetention | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
