View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Operations RACI Matrix | ![]() UX Research Customer Journey Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | With unclear responsibilities across several roles or areas, the method creates unambiguous accountability logic. It reduces friction because decision, execution, contribution, and information become separately visible. | When a user journey falls apart across many touchpoints, customer journey mapping makes the experience visible as a coherent arc. Phases, emotions, and breaks become legible enough to prioritize critical moments deliberately. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 45-90 min | 2-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 | 2-8 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | RACI Matrix, Responsibility Map, Decision Notes | Journey Map, Pain-point List, Opportunity Backlog |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | RolesResponsibilityGovernanceOperations | JourneyServiceService design |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






