methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Acceptance Criteria Workshop with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Agile
Acceptance Criteria Workshop
Paper illustration of two user profile cards with a goal, behavior evidence, and an open research question.
UX Research
Personas
Purposedifferent
When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update.When target groups stay too vague and teams talk about the same people differently, personas create a shared, solid picture of usage. Condensed profiles make needs, contexts, and differences tangible enough for decisions.
Complexitydifferent
LowMedium
Timedifferent
20-40 min pro Story1-3 Tage
Participantsdifferent
3-6Internes Team
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Acceptance Criteria, Story UpdatePersona Profiles, Needs Summary, Scenario Notes
Tagsno overlap
AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development
ResearchCustomerSynthesis
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration of a yellow story card, blue rule cards, green example cards and a red question card on a light workspace.
Agile
Example Mapping
Paper illustration of Specification by Example with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Agile
Specification by Example
Paper illustration of two people facing each other, speech bubbles and an open interview notebook.
UX Research
User Interviews