View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations ABC Analysis |  UX Research Contextual Inquiry |  UX Research HEART Framework |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention. | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 1-3 Wochen | 120 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 1-5 | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | ABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control List | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | HEART-GSM Table, Dashboard |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio | UX researchObservationContext | MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
