methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Paper illustration for TRIZ
Innovation
TRIZ
Paper illustration for Fault Isolation.
Engineering
Fault Isolation
Purposedifferent
For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.For technical contradictions or trade-offs, the method looks for solutions that resolve opposing requirements at the same time. It translates limits into an explicit picture of conflict that becomes workable. This produces not just compromises but more elegant principles.In technical failures, the visible symptom often gets mixed up with the actual cause. Fault Isolation narrows the fault space and progressively reduces which part of the system is truly affected.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min1-4 h30-180 min
Participantsdifferent
2-52-81-6
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisContradiction Statement, Inventive Principles, Solution ConceptsFault Isolation Map, Test Log, Excluded Hypotheses, Narrowed Fault Area
Tagsno overlap
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
InnovationProblem solvingContradictionsCreativity
TroubleshootingDiagnosisEngineering
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration for Contradiction Analysis.
Innovation
Contradiction Analysis
Paper illustration for Hypothesis-Driven Troubleshooting.
Engineering
Hypothesis-Driven Troubleshooting
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk