View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations A3 Problem Solving | ![]() Business Strategy GAP Analysis | ![]() Business Strategy Balanced Scorecard |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together. | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. | Balanced Scorecard translates strategy into a few interconnected perspectives and metrics. It holds impact, steering, and learning together in daily work instead of narrowing strategy down to financial figures. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-3 h | Halber Tag bis mehrere Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 2-5 | 2-8 | 4-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes | Balanced Scorecard, Strategic Measures, Initiative Map |
Tagsno overlap | LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations | StrategyAnalysisPlanning | StrategyMetricsExecution |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






